Archive/Dongs 2020

One of the Warwick rowers. James I think maybe? Cant find his insta anymore. May have regretted doing A LOT of explicit full frontal shots and taken his socials down.

>>179395 what?! explicit pictures? please, share!

Well like this one. Detailed high res full frontal. Nothing hard obviously. But some of the ones that were uploaded last week are so high res you can see ever detail of his cock.

I often wonder whether these lads noticed when they were crossing the line from a fun charity calendar to porn.

It's one thing when you're in a group of ten mates and your cocks peeking out from behind a oar. But these shots are in your face solo nudes. They might be classy and well shot, but they're only getting used for pervs to jerk off to.

It's the ultimate gay for pay. Straight lads getting tricked into doing gay porn.

And for the models, once they've left college and are in a professional job a few years down the line, these pictures are really awkward. If you get the chance to explain them, you can tell people they were for charity. But most of the time people are just going to share them and judge you behind your back.

Most of them seem to have distanced themselves from it once they realise. But more and more of the pics are out there forever now.

>>179667 good point!

>>179667 lol this is not porn.

>>179667 where were they posted? thread?

A number of posts on this thread have disappeared including the wetransfer file of more of his nudes

>>179717
Agreed. For some of them, it may be a regretful decision. But the WR pics simply can't be classed as porn. It's not even definable as 'soft porn'! For that you need arousal (i.e. hard cocks), and/or simulated or actual sex. Yeah, we really love the WR boys' cocks, but to call their work 'porn' and them porn stars is really stretching it.....

Most of the WRs are basically recruited for the calendar and barely row at all. Also a lot of them are gay anyway. Went to high school with one of them and rowed at a different university myself.

Anyway....fat balls!!!

So you think that just because they aren't aroused people aren't jerking off to these pictures? If it isnt porn, what is it? Why do you think peoole were paying £100 for the boatload? For the art? For the beautiful scenery? Of course not. They saw these hot young guys in the calendars and they wanted to see them exposed. Its voyeurism. Its seeing that private part that you'd only normally get to see in so much detail if you were servicing them. The bone is irrelevant. Once you've seen a pic like this you can fill in the rest yourself. And to know that it isnt someone who's chosen to do porn makes it even hotter. You're seeing the innocent straight guy from next door posing for you like a slit before getting on with his life to become a young professional. When do you ever get to see that?

Bump, for more of him

Young guys are dumb. They get their junk out without thinking its gonna be online for the next decade.

>>180038
take your meds young lady. no need to pee yourself with anger

>>180103

Almost everyone has nudes online nowadays, especially most gay dudes. Don't think anyone cares

He can wreck me any day

Imagine if you were floppy in all your nudes though, bahahahahahaha