Archive/Dongs 2017

Damn I wanna know him js..

His name is Jayden Rembacher, his socials as far as I know
insta: jayden_rembacher
snapchat: jaydenrembacher

Um..his instagram says he's 16

>>31907 And? at 16 the boys are already jerking off, fucking... and if you let them maybe rapping, stealing, killing in the army, etc. I know it's "the LAW", but stop saying "ohhh it's 16-15" like's some kind of saint.

>>31930 lol omg chill. You're a perv, he's 16. Move on with your life. You can't even spell "raping" correctly.

>>31935 If someone bothers to report him, yes.

>>31952 So he's 16, I bet he doesn't jerk off, I bet he doesn't want to fuck with anybody... The guys at 16 are sooooooo pure, I mean, look at his pictures... sooooooo pure and ZERO sexual!
What an ass, I know the laws in some countries say 16-17 or 18, IT'S THE LAW, but calling someone "pedo" because he likes some 16yo guy that post pics of his bulge on the net, and threat that 16yo guy like a little and innocent child... it's stupid!
If >>31930 was drooling over someone under 15 I understand, but really, at 16 a lots of guys already fucked with somebody.

>>31930
This forum is for sharing porn, if you want pedo fap material you're gonna have to go somewhere else

>>31976 So you are the owner of this place?

in defense of the op, he just asked if anyone knew who the guy was, not for nudes and even if he did ask for nudes, he clearly didn't know how old the guy is since he didn't know his name or instagram.

>>31967 Anything that's over 15yo AND it's sexualized it's free range for me. Under 18 AND NOT sexualized it's not for me.
But a fucking guy that like to show his dick, or his bulge, etc... it's free range ONLY IF it's over 15.
I'm not pro or anti, I just hate the people that talk like if those guys were made from crystal, fragile snowflakes, innocent guys. If a guy it's a normal chav that dress like normal, talk like normal and some weird old dude drools over him, well, I'll find that disgusting. But if the guy shows his body, his bulge, make erotics videos because HE wanted to do them, etc... If it's over 15 it's free range.

>>31956 No he wouldn't be charged. Yeah he's in his underwear and you can see his bulge but he's not naked or doing something overly sexual (like jerking off etc.). Even pictures like this are not illegal since this was public picture and he has clothes on. Also thinking or saying you think someone is hot even if they are under 18 isn't illegal.

I added him on sc, hes always asking for "anyone" to snapchat him lol.... im kinda tempted to.

>>32062 Go for it anon! but be careful, I bet that "anyone" refers to "girls only I'm not fag bro lolzzz!!11!!".

Anybody snapchatted him? He's open to "anyone" or just "girlzz"?

>>31981 it's illegal to post naked pictures of anyone under 18, sorry for your "preference," but nobody will be posting that here. Maybe you should try another site that better caters to your preferences.

>>31979 I get what you're saying, but with all due respect, isn't this question under the "Dongs" category? Wtf else would OP be looking for on here?

>>32118 Ohhh another SJW! nobody's going to post nudes, we know it's not legal, so stop with your SJW shit.

>>32140 post nudes of an underage boy? Never! We're just helping someone to solicit nudes out of him for their own personal CP collection.

I don't understand why in all of his instagram pic, where he's only on boxers... He always have a semi, not a hardon and not flacid, just a semi (a biig semi). He likes to tease, and I like that. Just one more year and he's legal.

>>32140

>You have to be an SJW do not post nudes of an underage boy

No wonder the alt-right failed

>>32170
>>32140
honestly a true sjw would probably be arguing for more pederast acceptance

>>32165
three likely reasons: (1) his balls are just huge and push his dick out like that naturally, (2) he fluffs before he takes an IG pic so it looks big, (3) he's stuffing his shorts. i think it's probably #3 but who knows

>>32205 Lol, great analysis :D
at first I thought it was his natural bulge. But there are two pics on his IG, the one in the OP and another when he's flaccid (same scene, just before the pic from the OP)and... The guy touch himself before taking the pics to "grow" it, or likes to show his big bulge like nothing.

I love his bulge, he gets me hard every time I see it.

I really want to talk to him, but as someone already said I don't want to find this guy textin me "lolz I'm into gurlz you fag!". And I just want to talk, to pass time, IDK if send him a message or not.
PS: I finc weird that he wrote genderless "anyone" "someone".

>>32205
Obviously not because there is an anti-SJW that wants to get an underage boy naked

>>32227 "And I just want to talk, to pass time" SSSSUUUUUREEEEEE... "I just want to talk"... rolleyes at the pedo

I also find it odd he referred to "anybody" in his snapchat. If there is any fit teens/daddies in this forum they should at the very least confirm whether this dude likes dick or nah lol just sayin.

Also I'm 19, I find it lame that nudes of someone 3 years younger than me is considered 'pedophilia' when he looks likes he's in his mid 20's. Kid these days look NOTHING like their age anymore. Even I don't, everyone always thinks I'm 12-14.

>>32279 Well it's not pedophilia!

It's ephebophilia.

>>32288 Well... Thanks I suppose, I was already thinking that for "like" this guy I was automatically going to rape every 5yo in my neighborhood...
>>32279 I would easily pass this guy as 19-20-21yo... It doesn't look like 16.

Looool at you thirsty homos that don't care that he's 16 because he's not "pure or ZERO sexual" because should someone post his nudes here, and he report it, you're getting arrested for downloading child pornography regardless of whether or not this kid is consenting or not.

OMG you guys. It's not that hard. Yes, he's a hot 16 year old. No one is arguing that. We're saying you shouldn't post nudes of this child online because he is not of consenting adult age. You're the adult, you're the one in the wrong. It's correct that children have sexual thoughts and may even post provocative picture (or even sext nudes), but you're the fucking adult. Just wait til he's 18 and then you've had done nothing wrong. There's plenty of 18 year olds to thirst about online, some even look younger than him! :/

Idk how you can't control your urge to see or post nudes of an underage person. Yes, you can be curious but don't do it. Don't act on it. It's not that hard to move on with your life.

>>32315 1- the age of consent in my country it's 16yo, 2- suck my dick, 3- go to troll to that guy Calvin thread because you are boring...
Thanks

>>32329 good for you, just keep justifying yourself.

Regardless: posting nude pics of anyone under 18 online ANYWHERE is still a crime so... ¯\(ツ)/¯

>>32339 Not in my country, so ¯\(ツ)/¯ ¯\(ツ)/¯ ¯\(ツ)/¯ (from what country are you >>32329 ? lol)
>>32328 I like your answer, I know it's not legal to post pics of this guy, and really... it's my problem if I found him hot.
I have problems with the idiots that points fingers "you! old pedo! why you lust over this soooo innocent guy! you are corrupting him!", Well, I have 18Yo, when I was 14 some shits on school (15-16yo) tried to rape me in a bathroom so, when someone cries "you are corrupting a young innocent boyyyy" I get really pissed because I know that the vast majority of guys at that age are FAR from innocent, I'm not discussing the law, I'm discussing the idiots that thinks that having 15 or 16yo automatically makes you the most innocent snowflake shit in the world.

>>32341
Your laws don't matter, shitdick. Malegeneral is hosted in America and has to adhere to American laws, where people younger than 18 constitute as children and thus, would be child pornography.

>>32341
I'm sorry no basic white girls are wanted here

I think he just add girls to his SC
I added him, tried to send a message but the damn "Sending Fail, Tap to retry" appears, I can send messages to other contacts and can see their/his stories, but I can't send him messages.

>>32365 maybe he didn't added you as a friend, you are not blocked, but if he didn't add you you can see his snaps but not write to him, something I find weird because he was begging literally for "someone" or "anybody" to talk to him.
Anyways I use Kik, snapchat it's shit.

Sadly it's impossible to chat with him, if you are honest and say that you are a guy (he ask "are you a guy or girl?") he blocks you automatically. You can't even see his snaps anymore (anyways he continues asking for "someone" o "anyone" to talk every weekend)