Ok, fine, I'll get in on this too...
First of all that 'question' implied he thinks something works and he wants to know what, not that something 'is working', and being more of a request as opposed to a much more specific question or technical question it's obvious he's not sure which works and what doesn't. Backing that up, he first said he read it, then said he didn't understand what was going on. Then the very next post snapped 'well if you read it you wouldn't be asking what to do'. You didn't place words in his mouth, you took them out! Which is basically the same thing in the end. So you choose to completely ignore the fact he clearly said in plain english he didn't understand "what was going on", not what people "were using", and accused him of not reading anything. I'd be quite insulted myself in that situation too. If a person says they didn't understand what they were reading, why, and especially 'how' would you accuse them of not reading anything? You're forcing your opinion against his fact. And instead of just providing any solution to the request; just up and said oh! you didn't read it! because if you did, you'd know. That's insulting! Do you understand how people can read something and not get it? It ain't the same as not reading, brother, let me tell you. Then you tell him to fuck off for not having reading comprehension which would have made a better reply than accusing him of not reading the thread in the first place. But you didn't. Which makes you just as guilty as not comprehending reading too. Moreso, even, because its a single post vs. an extremely long thread to have to keep up with. Yeah. It's obvious who has the lesser reading skills.
Comment too long. Click
here for full text.
